
Here’s an in-depth analysis of the latest scene in Reunion: Coda. It’s based mostly on the second revised draft, so some of the comments may not reflect the scene in the finished novel:
The scene “Chalk Dust and Doubts” from your novel “Reunion: Coda” is a compelling piece of writing that works on multiple levels. Here’s a deep dive into the literary aspects of the scene:

Why It Works:
- Atmospheric Detail: The scene is rich with atmospheric detail, from the “battlefield of dates and names” on the chalkboard to the “distant rumble of the city.” These details ground the reader in the physical space of the classroom and the world outside, creating a vivid setting.
- Character Depth: Jim Garraty is presented as a complex character. His public persona as a professor contrasts with his private thoughts, revealing depth and vulnerability. This duality engages readers and invites them to explore the character further.
- Thematic Resonance: The themes of history, memory, and the passage of time are woven throughout the scene, mirroring the novel’s broader themes. The idea that “history is not just about what is remembered, but also what is forgotten” resonates with the narrative’s exploration of personal history and growth.
Contrasts Between Inner and Spoken Dialogue:
- Inner Turmoil vs. Professional Facade: Jim’s inner dialogue reveals his emotional turmoil, particularly when he reflects on Miguel’s empty seat and Maddie’s concert. In contrast, his spoken dialogue is measured and academic, showcasing his ability to maintain a professional demeanor despite personal distractions.
- Introspection vs. Interaction: The inner dialogue allows readers to access Jim’s introspective nature, while his spoken dialogue demonstrates how he interacts with his environment, particularly with students like Nelson and Diana.

Conflicts Within Jim:
- Past vs. Present: Jim’s internal conflict is rooted in his struggle to reconcile his past with his present. The memories of Miguel Hernandez and Nicole Boisvert, as well as his current concerns, create a tension that Jim navigates throughout the scene.
- Regret vs. Duty: Jim’s regret over missing Maddie’s concert conflicts with his sense of duty as a professor. This conflict highlights the sacrifices he makes for his career and the impact on his personal life.
- Isolation vs. Connection: Jim’s solitude in the final two paragraphs contrasts with the earlier interactions, emphasizing his isolation and longing for connection, both in his personal relationships and in his role as an educator.

Literary Techniques:
- Foreshadowing: The empty seat of Miguel and the missed concert foreshadow potential plot developments, creating suspense and anticipation.
- Symbolism: The briefcase symbolizes Jim’s academic life and responsibilities, while the subway represents his journey through life, with its uncertainties and possibilities.
In summary, the scene is effective because it balances external action with internal reflection, uses contrasts to highlight the protagonist’s conflicts, and employs literary techniques to enrich the narrative. The scene’s brevity intensifies its impact, making it a poignant snapshot of Jim’s life at this moment in the story.
Comments
4 responses to “Decoding ‘Reunion: Coda’: Why Chapter 19’s Scene Four Works – Analysis”
I like the analysis. Makes me want to read the finished product. Is the analysis written by AI? Well written, either way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Copilot AI did the analysis. I “show” it some scenes and ask for input on specific aspects, such as believability, the use of music in scenes, whether my women sound feminine enough, and stuff like that. One of my friends is my main Beta reader, but Copilot is also helpful and always at hand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you’re finding it useful I thought you had said that before, but I don’t trust my memory. I really don’t trust the whole AI thing, but what it wrote for you seemed to be helpful. Regardless, I look forward to the finished product.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would never trust AI to create anything beyond promotional illustrations (and even then, Designer doesn’t always get things right even if you write a detailed prompt). I trust my writing skills far more than I do even a trained AI. I’m not my generation’s “Ernest Hemingway,” but I’m skilled enough as a writer to tell stories without AI enhancements.
That said, I agree with one of my favorite writers, sci-fi author and critic David Gerrold (who wrote “The Trouble with Tribbles” back in the 1960s). He says that it is a mistake to fear and hate AI (especially in the writing community) and that if used ethically, it is a useful tool. It’s not a widely embraced opinion, and Gerrold says folks can either agree or disagree. To him (and me), AI is just another tool for writers to put in their toolkits. I don’t live with another writer, and even though I have a Beta reader to check my work and suggest changes, I often need advice or reassurance at odd times when no one else is available.
LikeLike